jul 4, 2025

draft theory: findings from my 2015-2024 nfl draft analysis

this post turns a long thread into one narrative: where draft capital was spent well, where it was burned, and what surplus value says about how teams actually create advantage.

top 5 all-time draft gems (2015-2024)

these players did not just beat expectations. they blew past the price implied by where they were picked.

  • tyreek hill (r5 p165): +259.0 surplus | ev 147.4 → actual 406.4
  • budda baker (r2 p36): +173.8 surplus | ev 110.0 → actual 283.8
  • t.j. watt (r1 p30): +168.2 surplus | ev 107.0 → actual 275.2
  • dak prescott (r4 p135): +161.6 surplus | ev 7.2 → actual 168.8
  • chris jones (r2 p37): +156.4 surplus | ev 42.1 → actual 198.5

best and worst positions to draft

this is where the draft gets counterintuitive: some positions look chaotic in single seasons but still deliver positive long-run surplus.

best avg surplus

  • +5.6 nt (nose tackle)
  • +4.6 center
  • +4.0 punter
  • +3.6 guard
  • +0.8 qb

worst avg surplus

  • -1.6 wr
  • -2.6 cb
  • -3.2 de

takeaway: interior linemen look consistently underrated, edge and db outcomes skew boom-bust, and wr has lagged in surplus terms more than most people expect.

top 5 biggest draft busts (2015-2024)

these are the picks where draft cost and on-field return were the most out of balance.

  • eli apple (r1 p10): -76.8 surplus | ev 142.6 → actual 65.8
  • ed oliver (r1 p9): -75.8 surplus | ev 164.2 → actual 88.4
  • malik mcdowell (r2 p35): -70.0 surplus | low realized return

best and worst drafting teams (2015-2024)

using average surplus value per pick (actual minus expected), you can see which front offices repeatedly found value beyond consensus.

  • 1. chiefs: +10.9 (71 picks)
  • 2. cowboys: +5.3 (77 picks)
  • 3. rams (stl + la): +4.0 (88 picks)
  • 4. saints: +2.3 (58 picks)
  • 5. ravens: +2.1